Getting Started with UML
Getting Started with UML
By James Sugrue
35,218 Downloads · Refcard 112 of 151 (see them all)
Download
FREE PDF
The Essential UML Cheat Sheet
Getting Started with UML
ABOUT UML
The Unified Modeling Language is a set of rules and notations for the specification of a software system, managed and created by the Object Management Group. The notation provides a set of graphical elements to model the parts of the system.
This Refcard outlines the key elements of UML to provide you with a useful desktop reference when designing software.
UML Tools
There are a number of UML tools available, both
commercial and open source, to help you document
your designs. Standalone tools, plug-ins and UML
editors are available for most IDEs.
Diagram Types
UML 2 is composed of 13 different types of diagrams as defined by the specification in the following taxonomy.
STRUCTURAL DIAGRAMS
Class Diagrams
Class diagrams describe the static structure of the classes in your system and illustrate attributes, operations and relationships between the classes.
Modeling Classes
The representation of a class has three compartments.
Figure 1: Class representation
From top to bottom this includes:
- Name which contains the class name as well as the stereotype, which provides information about this class. Examples of stereotypes include <<interface>>, <<abstract>> or <<controller>>.
- Attributes lists the class attributes in the format name:type, with the possibility to provide initial values using the format name:type=value
- Operations lists the methods for the class in the format method( parameters):return type.
Operations and attributes can have their visibility annotated as follows: + public, # protected, - private, ~ package

usually represented in italics.
| Relationship | Description |
| Dependency “...uses a…” |
A weak, usually transient, relationship that illustrates that a class uses another class at some point.
Figure 2: ClassA has dependency on ClassB |
| Association “…has a...” | Stronger than dependency, the solid line relationship indicates that the class retains a reference to another class over time.
Figure 3: ClassA associated with ClassB |
| Aggregation “…owns a…” | More specific than association, this indicates that a class is a
container or collection of other classes. The contained classes do not have a life cycle dependency on the container, so
when the container is destroyed, the contents are not. This is depicted using a hollow diamond.
Figure 4: Company contains Employees |
| Composition “…is part of...” | More specific than aggregation, this indicates a strong life cycle dependency between classes, so when the container is destroyed, so are the contents. This is depicted using a filled diamond.
Figure 5: StatusBar is part of a Window |
| Generalization “…is a…” | Also known as inheritance, this indicates that the subtype is a more specific type of the super type. This is depicted using a hollow triangle at the general side of the relationship.
Figure 6: Ford is a more specific type of Car |
Association Classes
Sometimes more complex relationships exist between classes, where a third class contains the association information.
Figure 7: Account associates the Bank with a Person
Annotating relationships
For all the above relationships, direction and multiplicity can be expressed, as well as an annotation for the relationship. Direction is expressed using arrows, which may be bi-directional.
The following example shows a multiple association, between ClassA and ClassB, with an alias given to the link.
Figure 8: Annotating class relationships

Object Diagrams
Object diagrams provide information about the relationships between instances of classes at a particular point in time. As you would expect, this diagram uses some elements from class diagrams.
Typically, an object instance is modeled using a simple rectangle without compartments, and with underlined text of the format InstanceName:Class
Figure 9: A simple object diagram
The object element may also have extra information to model the state of the attributes at a particular time, as in the case of myAccount in the above example.
Component Diagrams
Component diagrams are used to illustrate how components of a system are wired together at a higher level of abstraction than class diagrams. A component could be modeled by one or more classes.
A component is modeled in a rectangle with the <<component>> classifier and an optional component icon:
Figure 10: UML representation of a single component
Assembly Connectors
The assembly connector can be used when one component needs to use the services provided by another.
Figure 11: AccountManagement depends on the CreditChecker services
Using the ball and socket notation, required or provided interfaces are illustrated as follows
Figure 12: Required and provided interface notation
Port Connectors
Ports allow you to model the functionality that is exposed to the outside world, grouping together required and provided interfaces for a particular piece of functionality. This is particularly useful when showing nested components.
Figure 13: Nested component diagram showing use of ports
Composite Structure Diagrams
Composite structure diagrams show the internal structure of a class and the collaborations that are made possible.
The main entities in a composite structure diagram are parts, ports, connectors, collaborations, as well as classifiers.
Parts
Represent one or more instances owned by the containing instance. This is illustrated using simple rectangles within the owning class or component. Relationships between parts may also be modeled.
Figure 14: Diagram class with a Square and Line as part of its structure
Ports
Represent externally visible parts of the structure. They are shown as named rectangles at the boundary of the owning structure. As in component diagrams, a port can specify the required and provided services.
Connectors
Connectors bind entities together, allowing them to interact at runtime. A solid line is typically drawn between parts. The name and type information is added to the connector using a name:classname format. Multiplicity may also be annotated on the connector.
Figure 15: A connector between two parts
Collaborations
Represents a set of roles that can be used together to achieve some particular functionality. Collaborations are modeled using a dashed ellipse.
Figure 16: Collaboration between a number of entities

Deployment Diagrams
Deployment diagrams model the runtime architecture of the system in a real world setting. They show how software entities are deployed onto physical hardware nodes and devices.
Association links between these entities represent communication between nodes and can include multiplicity.
| Entity | Description |
![]() |
Either a hardware or software element shown as a 3D box shape. Nodes can have many stereotypes, indicated by an
appropriate icon on the top right hand corner. An instance is made different to a node by providing an underlined “name:node type” notation. |
![]() |
An artifact is any product of software development, including source code, binary files or documentation. It is depicted using a document icon in the top right hand corner. |
Figure 17: Deployment diagram example
Package Diagrams
Package diagrams show the organization of packages and the elements inside provide a visualization of the namespaces that will be applied to classes. Package diagrams are commonly used to organize, and provide a high level overview of, class diagrams.
As well as standard dependencies, there are two specific types of relationships used for package diagrams. Both are depicted using the standard dashed line dependency with the appropriate stereotype (import or merge).
- Package Import Used to indicate that the importing namespace adds the names of the members of the package to its own namespace. This indicates that the package can access elements within another package. Unlabeled dependencies are considered imports.
- Package Merge Used to indicate that the contents of both packages are combined in a similar way to the generalization relationship.
Figure 18: Package merge example
BEHAVIORAL DIAGRAMS
Use Case Diagrams
Use case diagrams are a useful, high level communication tool to represent the requirements of the system. The diagram shows the interaction of users and other external entities with the system that is being developed.
Graphical Elements
| Entity | Description |
![]() |
Actors represent external entities in the system and can be human, hardware or other systems. Actors are drawn using a stick figure. Generalization relationships can be used to represent more specific types of actors, as in the example. |
![]() |
A use case represents a unit of functionality that can interact with external actors or related to other use cases. Use cases are represented with a ellipse with the use case name inside. |
| Boundary | Use cases are contained within a system boundary, which is depicted using a simple rectangle. External entities must not be placed within the system boundary |
Graphical Elements
| Notation | Description |
Includes![]() |
Illustrates that a base use case may include another, which implies that the included use case behavior is inserted into the behavior of the base use case. |
Extends![]() |
Illustrates that a particular use case provides additional functionality to the base use case, in some alternative flows. This can be read to mean that it’s not required to complete the goal of the base use case. |
| Generalization | Used when there is a common use case that provides basic functionality that can be used by a more specialized use case. |

Figure 19: A simple use case diagram
Documenting Use Cases
Behind each use case there should be some text describing it. The following are typical sections in a use case definition:
| Section | Description |
| Name and Description | Use cases are should have verb names, and have a brief description. |
| Requirements | This could be a link to an external formal specification, or an internal listing of the requirements that this use case will fulfill. |
| Constraints | The pre and post conditions that apply to this use case’s execution. |
| Scenarios | The flow of events that occur during the execution of the use case. Typically this starts with one positive path, with a number of alternative flows referenced. |
Activity Diagrams
Activity diagrams capture the flow of a program, including major actions and decision points. These diagrams are useful for documenting business processes.
Figure 20: Activity diagram
Graphical Elements
| Section | Description |
Action![]() |
Represents one step in the program flow, illustrated using a rounded rectangle. |
Constraints![]() |
Action constraints are linked to an action in a note with text of the format <<stereotype>>{constraint} |
| Start Node |
The start node is used to represent where the flow begins. This is illustrated using a single back spot. |
| Activity Final Node |
Represents the end of all control flows within the activity. |
Flow Final Node
|
Represents the end of a single flow. |
| Control Flow |
Represents the flow of control from one action to the next as a solid line with an arrowhead. |
Object Flow
|
If an object is passed between activities, a representation of the object can be added in between the activities. It is also possible represent object flow by adding a square representing the object on either side of the control flow. |
Decision Node
|
An annotated diamond shape is used to represent decisions in the control flow. This can also be used to merge flows. A decision node will have a condition documented that needs to be met before that path can be taken. |
Fork Node
|
Represented using a horizontal or vertical bar, a fork node illustrates the start of concurrent threads. The same notation can be used for the joining of concurrent threads. |
Partition
|
Swimlanes can be used in activity diagrams to illustrate activities performed by different actors. |
Region
|
Regions are used to group certain activities together. A stereotype is applied to the region to identify whether it is iterative or parallel. Regions are illustrated using a dotted rounded rectangle. |
State Machine Diagrams
State machine diagrams are used to describe the state transitions of a single object’s lifetime in response to events. State machine diagrams are modeled in a similar way to activity diagrams.
| Entity | Description |
State![]() |
States model a moment in time for the behavior of a classifier. It is illustrated using a rounded rectangle. |
| Initial Post |
Represents the beginning of the execution of this state machine. Illustrated using a filled circle. |
| Entry Point |
In cases when it is possible to enter the state machine at a later stage than the initial state this can be used. Illustrated using an empty circle. |
| Final State |
Represents the end of the state machine execution. Represented using a circle containing a black dot. |
| Exit Point |
Represents alternative end points to the final state, of the state machine. Illustrated using a circle with a X. |
| Transition |
Represented as a line with an arrowhead. Transitions illustrate movement between states. They can be annotated with a Trigger[Guard]/Effect notation. States may also have self transitions, useful for iterative behavior. |
State
|
A state can also be annotated with any number of trigger/effect pairs, which is useful when the state has a number of transitions. |
Nested States
|
States can themselves contain internal state machine diagrams. |
State Choice
|
A decision is illustrated using a diamond, with a number of transitions leaving from the choice element. |
State junction
|
Junctions are used to merge a number of transitions from different states. A junction is illustrated using a filled circle. |
Terminate State
|
Indicates that the flow of the state machine has ended, illustrated using an X |
History State
|
History states can be used to model state memory, where the state resumes from where it was last time. This is drawn using a circle with a H inside. |
Concurrent Region
|
A state can have multiple substates executing concurrently, which is modeled using a dashed line to separate the parallel tracks. Forks and merges (see activity diagram) are used to split/merge transitions. |

INTERACTION DIAGRAMS
Interaction diagrams are a subset of behavioral diagrams that deal with the flow of control across the modeled system.
Sequence Diagrams
Sequence diagrams describe how entities interact, including what messages are used for the interactions. All messages are described in the order of execution.
Along with class and use case, sequence diagrams are the most used diagrams for modeling software systems.
Lifeline Objects
A sequence diagram is made up of a number of lifelines. Each entity gets its own column. The element is modeled at the top of the column and the lifeline is continued with a dashed line. The following are the options for lifeline objects, with the final three the being most specific.
| Section | Description |
Actor![]() |
Actors represent external entities in the system. They can be human, hardware or other systems. Actors are drawn using a stick figure. |
General Lifeline![]() |
Represents an individual entity in the sequence diagram, displayed as a rectangle. It can have a name, stereotype or could be an instance (using instance:class) |
Boundary
|
Boundary elements are usually at the edge of the system, such as user interface, or back-end logic that deals with external systems. |
Control
|
Controller elements manage the flow of information for a scenario. Behavior and business rules are typically managed by such objects. |
Entity
|
Entities are usually elements that are responsible for holding data or information. They can be thought of as beans, or model objects. |

Messages
The core of sequence diagrams are the messages that are passed between the objects modeled. Messages will usually be of the form messagename(parameter).
A thin rectangle along the lifeline illustrates the execution lifetime for the object’s messages.
Messages can be sent in both directions, and may skip past other lifelines on the way to the recipient.
| Entity | Description |
| Synchronous |
A message with a solid arrowhead at the end. If the message is a return message it appears as a dashed line rather than solid. |
| Asynchronous |
A message with a line arrowhead at the end. If the message is a return message it appears as a dashed line rather than solid. |
| Lost |
A lost message is one that gets sent to an unintended receiver, or to an object that is not modeled in the diagram. The destination for this message is a black dot. |
| Found |
A found message is one that arrives from an unknown sender, or from an object that is not modeled in the diagram. The unknown part is modeled as a black dot. |
| Self Message | A self message is usually a recursive call, or a call to another method belonging to the same object. |

Fragments
Fragments are sections of logic that are executed given a particular condition. These fragments can be of many different types.
| Entity | Description |
| alt | Models if then else blocks |
| opt | Models switch statements |
| break | For alternative sequence of events |
| par | Concurrent blocks |
| seg | Set of messages to be processed in any order before continuing |
| strict | Set of messages to be processed in strict order before continuing |
| neg | Invalid set of messages |
| critical | Critical section |
| ignore | Messages of no interest |
| consider | The opposite to ignore. |
| assert | Will not be shown if the assertion is invalid |
| loop | Loop fragment |
Figure 21: Sequence Diagram Fragment
Communication Diagrams
Also known as a collaboration diagram, communication diagrams are similar to sequence diagrams, except that they are defined in free form instead of lifelines. The focus of this diagram is object relationships between boundary, control and entity types.
Messages between the participants are numbered to provide sequencing information.
Figure 22: Simple communication diagram
Interaction Overview Diagrams
An interaction overview diagram is a form of activity diagram where each node is a link to another type of interaction diagram. This provides a useful way to give high level overviews or indexes of the key diagrams in your system.
Figure 23: Interaction Overview Diagram














Comments
Parag Shah replied on Mon, 2010/08/30 - 2:01am
Roger Kaputnik replied on Wed, 2011/07/13 - 1:40am